首页> 外文OA文献 >Multimodal interventions to enhance adherence to secondary preventive medication after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses
【2h】

Multimodal interventions to enhance adherence to secondary preventive medication after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analyses

机译:多模式干预措施,以提高中风后对二级预防药物的依从性:系统评价和荟萃分析

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Summary:\udIntroduction:\udNonadherence to secondary preventative medications after stroke is common and is associated with poor outcomes. Numerous strategies exist to promote adherence. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the efficacy of strategies to improve adherence to stroke secondary prevention.\udMethods:\udWe created a sensitive search strategy and searched multiple electronic databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, CENTRAL, and Web of Knowledge) for studies of interventions that aimed to enhance adherence to secondary preventative medication after stroke. We assessed quality of included studies using the Cochrane tool for assessing risk of bias. We performed narrative review and performed meta-analysis where data allowed.\udResults:\udFrom 12,237 titles, we included seventeen studies in our review. Eleven studies were considered to have high risk of bias, 3 with unclear risk, and 3 of low risk. Meta-analysis of available data suggested that these interventions improved adherence to individual medication classes (blood pressure-lowering drugs – OR, 2.21; 95% CI (1.63, 2.98), [P < 0.001], lipid-lowering drugs – OR, 2.11; 95% CI (1.00, 4.46), [P = 0.049], and antithrombotic drugs – OR, 2.32; 95% CI (1.18, 4.56, [P = 0.014]) but did not improve adherence to an overall secondary preventative medication regimen (OR, 1.96; 95% CI (0.50, 7.67), [P = 0.332]).\udConclusion:\udInterventions can lead to improvement in adherence to secondary preventative medication after stroke. However, existing data is limited as several interventions, duration of follow-up, and various definitions were used. These findings need to be interpreted with caution.
机译:摘要:\ ud简介:\ ud中风后不坚持使用二级预防药物很普遍,并且与不良预后相关。存在许多促进遵守的策略。我们进行了系统的综述和荟萃分析,以描述提高对卒中二级预防的依从性的策略的功效。 Web of Knowledge)旨在研究旨在增强卒中后对二级预防药物依从性的干预措施。我们使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险,评估纳入研究的质量。 \ udResults:\ ud从12,237个书名中,我们纳入了十七项研究。十一项研究被认为具有偏见的高风险,三项具有不清楚的风险,三项具有低风险。对现有数据的荟萃分析表明,这些干预措施改善了对个别药物类别的依从性(降压药– OR,2.21; 95%CI(1.63,2.98),[P <0.001],降脂药– OR,2.11 ; 95%CI(1.00,4.46),[P = 0.049]和抗血栓药物– OR,2.32; 95%CI(1.18,4.56,[P = 0.014]),但并未改善对总体二级预防药物治疗方案的依从性(OR,1.96; 95%CI(0.50,7.67),[P = 0.332])。\ ud结论:\ ud干预措施可改善卒中后对二级预防药物的依从性,但由于几种干预措施,持续时间,现有数据有限随访,并使用各种定义,这些发现需要谨慎解释。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号